Recently Facebook has responded back nearly two weeks after the report Wall Street Journal on Instagram made body image issues inferior for one in three teenage girls agreeing to Facebook’s own data. The Salvo comes politeness of Pratiti Raychoudhury who is currently the Vice President, Head of Research at Facebook. The post of Pratiti on Facebook’s newsroom entitlements that The Wall Street Journal’s depiction of internal research is not correct and liabilities it all on a deprived clarification of data the WSJ has in its proprietorship.
WSJ Story on Body image issues
Recently, The Wall Street Journal published a story on 14th September on the Facebook Files, which is a sequence of stories grounded around a huge cache of inner Facebook documents disclosed to the newspaper.
The 14th September story focused on data that suggests Instagram had an exceedingly damaging effect on many teenagers especially teenage girls. According to the WSJ Face was well conscious of the damage its products had on teenagers and that the firm has made the least determinations to address these matters and plays them down in public.
Facebook has been ambiguous regarding the contents of the study quoted by the WSJ. But according to Facebook’s global head of safety, Antigone Davis, is probable to appear before the Senate Commerce Subcommittee Thursday to respond to the entitlements made in the story and strategies for the new Instagram for kids. Raychoudhury particularly mentions that hearing is the cause for the post.
Though Raychoudhury overlooks many of the matters raised in the WSJ story, including that teens appealed they felt habituated to Instagram. Instead, she emphasizes her energies on diminishing Facebook’s own investigation. Much of the WSJ’s most mocking claims, conferring to Raychoudhury, focus on a study that had just 40 participants. That would be a worthless sample size by any extent- but particularly when you are talking about a platform with over 1 billion users. The small study was planned to notify internal discussions about teens’ most undesirable perceptions of Instagram according to Raychoudhury.
Further Raychoudhury also takes offense with the WSJ raising to an internal Facebook slide that gives statements that “we make body images worse for 1 in 3 teenage girls. Raychoudhury constantly notes that the body image issue was just one of 12 conceivable issues that Instagram could make poorer for teenage girls. “Body image was the only part where teen girls who conveyed harassed with the issue said Instagram made it worse as related to the other 11 parts,” she writes.
Regrettably, neither Instagram, Facebook, or Raychoudhury have unconfined the actual data that she frequently quotes in her statement or response to the WSJ’s reporting. Without observing the complete factual data, it is very hard to measure The Wall Street Journal’s or Raychoudhury’s clarifications of it. But we all know this is not the very first time we have perceived these issues.